Legal Opinion

Spietz v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 16, 1987No. C86-597TBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Motions for Summary Judgment of defendants Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation (“Kaiser”) and United Steelworkers of America, Local 7945’s (“Union”). The motion brought by the Union raises the following issues:

1. Whether plaintiffs claim is barred by the six-month statute of limitations set forth in section 10(b) of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(b); and

2. Whether the Union breached its duty of fair representation of the plaintiff pursuant to section 302 of the LMRA.

Kaiser, in its motion,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heaning v. NYNEX-New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. McLinn v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API