Legal Opinion
United States v. Burreson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1981No. Nos. 78-1782, 78-1912 and 78-1774PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, District Judge.
Rodney Burreson, Ronald Laraneta, and Thomas Channell were indicted for various violations of the Investment Company and Investment Advisers Acts of 1940, securities fraud, and mail fraud, 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-l et seq. and 80b-l et seq., 77q, 1341; and for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Investment Acts make it unlawful for the managers of mutual funds to convert those funds; to engage in self-dealing in financial transactions; or to engage in fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative practices. 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-36, 80a-17, 80b-6. All appellants were charged and found…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward RinglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.