Hinton v. Little
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
The complaint alleges and the affidavits in support of the temporary injunction are of similar effect, and the testimony of the witness for the plaintiffs on the hearing in regard to the temporary injunction, shows unde-nied and undisputed except by defendants’ answer, which merely generally denies the allegations of the complaint, that the territory in question is underlaid at a depth of from two to three hundred feet, and beneath an impervious stratum, by subterranean waters confined horizontally between this upper impervious stratum and lower stratum, of such a nature as to force this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
- Le Quime v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Bower v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Silkey v. TiegsIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Washington County Irrigation District v. TalboyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.