Grigsby & Associates, Inc. v. M Securities Investment
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This case is about whether the district court should have permitted a dispute to be arbitrated. Plaintiffs, Grigsby & Associates, Inc., 1 argue that the district court should have enjoined the arbitration proceedings, in part because Defendants, M Securities Investment, Inc., 2 waived the right to arbitrate by engaging in litigation conduct inconsistent with that right. Plaintiffs also argue that, even if arbitration was permissible, the district court should have vacated the award the arbitration panel entered in Defendants’ favor. Because we conclude that the district court abused its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bryant v. CEO DeKalb Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Pitney Bowes, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Celina Mestre, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Mestre, Deceased, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Paige Martin v. Gary YasudaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Cooper v. Westend Capital Management, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- ABU NASER HOSSAIN v. JMU PROPERTIES, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rita Cusimano v. Andrew v. Schnurr Bernard v. StrianeseNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. CouchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.