Hanover Fire Insurance v. Shrader & Rogers
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hardeman. Tried below before Hon. Gr. A. Brown.
1Opinion of the Court
TARLTON, Chief Justice.
On April 36, 1893, M. E. Shrader, joined by her husband, Gr. W. Shrader, and W. J. Rogers, brought this suit against the appellant, Hanover Fire Insurance Co. They alleged that on December 7, 1893, the plaintiffs M. E. Shrader and W. J. Rogers composed the firm of Shrader & Rogers; that they were the owners of a certain stock of drugs, medicines, etc., in the town of' Quanah; that on the date named the appellant and the Citizens Fire Insurance Co. of New York, by insurance policy No. 300012, each company contracting for itself, insured the property as that of Shrader &…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Higgins v. Emily Johnson's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Pearson v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Roberts v. ConnelleeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southland Lloyd's Insurance Co. v. Tomberlain, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Twin City Fire Ins. v. Stockmen's Nat. Bank of Ft. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Modern Woodmen of America v. LaneNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Saul v. MosconeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Kisow v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.