Pearson v. Cox
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Fannin. Tried below before Hon. D. H. Scott. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Associate Justice.
March 24, 1884, M. M. Ussery and her husband, J. G. Ussery, brought suit against Cox to recover two hundred and eighty acres of land alleged to have been the homestead of plaintiff, and for the value of certain personal property appropriated by Cox. Pending the suit the husband died, and the widow married David Pearson. The suit was revived in name of M. M. Pearson and her five minor children, the heirs of J. G. Ussery—-it being alleged that there was no administration, and facts showing no need of one. David Pearson, the husband refusing to join with his wife as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berry v. DonleyTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Heidenheimer v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Clements v. HearneTexas Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wells v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Kendrick v. Wheeler and BowmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Boyer v. BerrymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Donaldson v. MeyerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Coburn v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.