Cox v. Banks
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
These two actions in admiralty were consolidated for purposes of trial. The first is by Cox against Banks for the balance due under a charter of a lighter and for the cost of repairing damage to the lighter occurring while she was chartered. In this action Banks, under Rule 56 of the Supreme Court Admiralty Rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, impleaded ' as a respondent Kelly Pile & Foundation Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Kelly) with whom Banks had entered into a sub-charter of the lighter, The second action is by Banks against Kelly for the same cost of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- The Moran No. 10District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDonough Construction Co. v. H. B. Fowler & Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Banks v. Chas. Kurz Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Gulf Wave Towing Co. v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
- Compass Marine Corp. v. Calore Rigging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.