Legal Opinion
Compass Marine Corp. v. Calore Rigging Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 87-5056PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This non-jury matter is a suit by plaintiff for damages under a charter agreement for the vessel, Magic. Defendant has counterclaimed claiming certain deficiencies in the vessel. The plaintiff has brought suit based upon the diversity jurisdiction of this court. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (West Supp. 1988). There has been no demand for a jury trial. From the hearings on March 27 through March 30, 1989, we make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
*178FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The plaintiff, Compass Marine…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Speedboat Racing Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Continental Grain Co. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
- KAI Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Appeal of Calore Rigging Corp., Tug MagicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Compass Marine Corporation v. Calore Rigging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989