Legal Opinion
The Moran No. 10
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 24, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 F.2d 255 (1924)
THE MORAN NO. 10.
MORAN TOWING & TRANSPORTATION CO.
v.
RARITAN COPPER WORKS et al.
District Court, S. D. New York.
March 24, 1924.
Macklin, Brown & Van Wyck and R. F. Lenahan, all of New York City, for libelant.
Carter, Carter & Phillips and Peter S. Carter, all of New York City, for Raritan Copper Works.
Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating and R. S. Erskine, all of New York City, for Rose & Durante.
WARD, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought to recover for damage to libelant's scow Moran No. 10, a boat without motive power of her own, while under the ordinary harbor charter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Schoonmaker Conners Co. v. Lambert Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- White v. Upper Hudson Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Hastorf v. F. R. Long-W. G. Broadhurst Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Wintringham v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Howard v. Dobbins-Trinity Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Rojas v. RobinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Petition of SC Loveland Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Cox v. BanksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Cleary Bros. v. Christie Scow Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.