Legal Opinion
Person v. Google Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 2006No. 06 Civ. 4683(RPP)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge.
By motion dated July 27, 2006, Defendant, Google INC. (“Google”), moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) all counts of Plaintiff, Carl E. Person’s (“Person”), Complaint for violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Donnelly Act, Sections 349(a) and 350 of New York’s General Business Law, and Section 16720 of the California Cartwright Act.
For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion to dismiss for improper venue is granted.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Andre L. Phillips v. Richard P. Seiter, Glenn Watson v. Jeffrey J. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Feldman v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- TRADECOMET. COM LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Zaltz v. JDATEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.