Legal Opinion
Lens Express, Inc. v. Ewald
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 16, 1995No. 03-94-00435-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
This appeal ensues from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees Lois Ewald, as Executive Director of the Texas Optometry Board, Dan Morales, as Attorney General of the State of Texas, and the Texas Optometric Association, Inc. (collectively the “State”). Appellants Lens Express, Inc. and its subsidiary, Managed Vision, Inc., (“Lens Express”) raise three arguments in five points of error. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
The Texas Optometry Act (the “Act”) as interpreted by the Texas Optometry Board (the “Board”) authorizes, but does not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- TCI Cablevision of Dallas, Inc. v. Owens, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- In Re Luby's Cafeterias, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Limon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.