Legal Opinion

Russell v. Hamlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1963No. 379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiffs’ evidence considered in the light roost favorable to them, and defendant’s testimony favorable to them (Smith v. Rawlins, 253 N.C. 67, 116 S.E. 2d 184; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707, 51 S.E. 2d 307), tends to show the following facts:

After supper on 1 December 1961 Mrs. Beulah Russell, with Hugh Williams as a passenger, drove her husband’s Ford automobile from Roxboro to Semora. There she saw defendant Jonah Hamlett, Henry, his brother, and Melvin, his nephew. Defendant had a drink at Se-mora. Mrs. Beulah Russell carried defendant, his brother, his nephew, and Hugh Williams in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Stegall v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. HamlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Ritch v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API