Legal Opinion

Ritch v. Hairston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

In order to make out a case against Hudson’s estate, plaintiffs must offer evidence tending to show (1) that the second collision was proximately caused by the negligence of Hudson; and (2) that the second collision proximately caused or contributed to the injuries upon which plaintiffs’ action is based. Riddle v. Artis, 246 N.C. 629, 99 S.E. 2d 857.

The ¡ruling on the motion .for nonsuit does not depend upon the plaintiffs’ testimony even though it be in conflict with other plaintiffs’ witnesses. Russell v. Hamlett, 259 N.C. 273, 130 S.E. 2d 395; Wiggins v. Ponder, 259 N.C. 277, 130 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Wiggins v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Russell v. HamlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API