Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Seattle School District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988No. 54586-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

In this case, we hold that the clear 30-day statutory limitation imposed by the State Legislature (RCW 28A.88.010) on the time within which an appeal must be taken from a school board decision means what it says, and appeals taken after that time limit has expired are not timely.

An employee of Seattle School District No. 1, Wanda Haynes brought this breach of contract action against the District based on the following facts. On January 19, 1981, the employee, who was a curriculum specialist for the 1980-81 school year, applied for and received sabbatical leave for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Floyd v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Francisco v. Board of Directors of Bellevue Public Schools, District No. 405Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Coughlin v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Washington Waste Systems, Inc. v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. NACHES VLY. SCH. DIST. v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Naches Valley School District No. JT3 v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Jones v. Industrial Electric-Seattle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API