Legal Opinion
Baxter v. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided December 9, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 2304PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*58OPINION
LAWRENCE, District Judge.
In this action which is brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 two areas of interlocutory controversy are involved:
CLASS ACTION
Rule 23 provides that as soon as practicable after the commencement of an action brought as a class action the court should determine by order whether it is to be so maintained. The judgment shall include and specify the members of the class. The complaint alleges that the class similarly situated to plaintiff consists of all persons employed by Savannah Sugar Refinery Company at Savannah who have been or will be denied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- John Martin Oatis, David Johnson, Sr., and R. T. Young v. Crown Zellerbach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Thomas L. Jenkins v. United Gas Corporation and Allan B. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- King v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
- Hall v. Werthan Bag CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Roman v. ESB, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Yaffe v. PowersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of America, Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- American Finance System Inc. v. HarlowDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.