Legal Opinion
Smith v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 12, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-316-JLLPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On June 22, 1990 the plaintiffs, Joseph and Deborah Smith, brought this action against the defendant Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (Com plaint, Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) In their complaint, the plaintiffs requested a jury trial. (D.I. 1.) The defendants received long-arm service (D.I. 5) but failed to appear, answer, move, or otherwise defend this suit. (D.I. 7.) Therefore, on September 28, 1990 the Deputy Clerk of the Court entered a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Celia Gumbs and James Gumbs v. Pueblo International, Inc. D/B/A Pueblo Supermarkets. Appeal of Pueblo International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Teng v. Metropolitan Retail Recovery Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Villanueva v. Account Discovery Systems, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Maxwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- McLean v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Hart v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.