Legal Opinion
In Re Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman, Movant. Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman v. Ricky Bell, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2004No. 02-6547, 02-6548PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from that court’s earlier judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Abdur’Rahman v. Bell, 999 F.Supp. 1073 (M.D.Tenn.1998). The district court held that petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment, which he filed pursuant to Rule 60(b), amounted to an impermissible second or successive habeas petition as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1).
This case requires us to determine whether and under what circumstances a prisoner may use Rule 60(b) of the Federal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Thompson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ronald R. Harries, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bharat Patel, Alibaba Charchor, Inc. And Mukesh PatelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.