Dickenson v. State, Dept. of Wildlife
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*935OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
In January 1981, appellant Robert E. Dickenson (“Dicken-son”) and respondent the State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Wildlife (“the State”) signed an agreement which allowed the State to enlarge the Illipah Reservoir located on Illipah Creek. Both the creek and the reservoir are located on Dickenson’s land. The State intended to enlarge the reservoir for fishing and public recreation purposes while continuing to provide irrigation water for Dickenson’s land.
The agreement, which is the subject of this appeal, acknowledged that Dickenson owned all outstanding water rights on…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullis v. Nevada National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. WaldmanNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Parsons Drilling, Inc. v. Polar Resources Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Sterling v. GoodmanNevada Supreme Court · 1986
4Cited by38 opinions
- Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Shelton v. SheltonNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Hilton Hotels U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.