Legal Opinion

Currans v. Seattle & San Francisco Railway & Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1904No. 4908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered April 3, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury for $25,000, for injuries sustained by a coal miner by a delayed blast.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received from the explosion of a blast in a coal mine. The suit was brought against the Seattle & San Francisco Railway & Navigation Company and the Green River Construction Company. At the trial a non-suit without prejudice was granted as to the latter company, but was denied as to the former. The cause was then submitted to a jury, and a verdict was returned against the said Seattle & San Francisco Railway & Navigation Company in the sum of $25,000. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment was entered in accordance with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Spurrier v. Front Street Cable Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pearson v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Benson v. English Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Props v. Washington Pulley & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lowe v. LoweWashington Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API