Legal Opinion

Cembrook v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1961No. S. F. 20707PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Mandate is sought by petitioner to compel the respondent court to set aside its order sustaining, on motion of the real party in interest, objections to requests for admissions made by petitioner.

Petitioner filed a complaint seeking damages for personal injuries alleged to have been incurred by ingestion, over a long period of time, and in the manner recommended or suggested in defendants’ advertising, of their product. In that complaint, Sterling Drug, Inc., a corporation (the real party in interest), was named as the principal defendant. After the completion of several other discovery…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Burke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API