Legal Opinion

Spahn v. Richards

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2021No. A159495Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JEFFREY SPAHN et al., A159495 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Alameda County DAN RICHARDS, Super. Ct. No. RG17851006) Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiffs Jeffrey Spahn and Paul Bontekoe (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from an amended judgment awarding defendant Dan Richards costs of proof under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420 for plaintiffs’ failure to admit certain requests for admission during discovery. We affirm.1 Pursuant to California…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API