Legal Opinion

Dave Zerwas Co. v. James Hamilton Construction Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1994No. 21358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Dave Zerwas Company (“Zerwas”) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Defendant-Appellee, James Hamilton Construction Company, (“Hamilton”). Zerwas filed suit against Hamilton alleging that Hamilton owed Zerwas a real estate commission and gross receipts tax based on an exclusive real estate listing contract. On appeal we address one issue: Whether conduct alone can serve as consent to the cancellation of an exclusive listing contract when the exclusive listing contract is within the Statute of Frauds, NMSA 1978, § 47-1-45 (Repl.Pamp.1991).1 We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Givens v. DoughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Yrisarri v. WallisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services of Illinois, Inc. v. JepsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diversified Development & Investment, Inc. v. HeilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Board of Education, Gadsden Independent School Dist. No. 16 v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Deere & Co. v. LoyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  4. Garrett R. Quintana, Sr. v. First National Bank of Santa Fe, Garrett R. Quintana, Sr. v. First National Bank of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Dave Zerwas v. James Hamilton Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API