Legal Opinion

Deere & Co. v. Loy

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 12, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2212-GTVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is a diversity of citizenship action brought to enforce an unconditional guaranty. Plaintiff Deere & Company (Deere) contends that K.I. Loy executed an uncondition al guaranty of the debts of Southeast Equipment, Inc. (Southeast), a John Deere dealer located in Oswego, Kansas. Defendant K.I. Loy contends that a letter dated July 24, 1985, authored by a third party, effectively revoked his guaranty. Plaintiff contends that the letter of revocation was ineffectual because it did not conform with the requirements of the guaranty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Simms v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  3. Milliken and Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baxter State Bank v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  2. Mellon v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  3. Deere & Company, a Delaware Corporation v. K.I. LoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. HSBC Bank (Uruguay) S.A. v. Seaboard CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. MNM Investments, LLC v. HDM, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API