Legal Opinion

Chavers v. Gatke Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2003No. A092551PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

This appeal requires us to consider the vitality of the idea of “group” or “collective” legal accountability in the products liability context. For well over a quarter century, courts across the nation have struggled with a variety of novel theories under which manufacturers of a defective product could assertedly be held liable in damages to plaintiffs injured by use of or exposure to it. Litigation involving asbestos, tobacco, and DES are prominent examples. Owing to circumstances, the plaintiffs in such cases often were unable to identify the specific manufacturer of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Fuller v. First Franklin Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Jane Doe-1 v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In Re Welding Fume Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Qwest Communications Corp. v. WeiszDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API