Legal Opinion

Hier v. Harpster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1907No. 14,928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to enforce the obligation of a surety. It was brought by Martha A. Hier, as administratrix of the estate of John D. Hier, deceased, against Fred Harpster, as surety on a promissory note given by J. F. Harpster to the deceased on September 22, 1898. J. F. Harpster was the cashier of the Wathena State Bank, with which the plaintiff had an account.

On September 22, 1899, when the plaintiff demanded payment of the interest due on the note, amounting to $80, J. F. Harpster made an entry in the pass-book of the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Poling v. MaddoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ray v. BrennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Farm Land Mortgage & Debenture Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Local No. 1179, Carpet Decorators Union v. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Reints v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Zavesky v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Sugg v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API