Legal Opinion
Royal's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
It is agreed that on April 5, 1928, the employee receiyed an injury to the left forearm, where there were four fractures, and was paid compensation for total disability up to August 26, 1928. At a hearing on- July 15, 1930, it appeared that he had returned to work and earned as high wages as before his injury and that he was not entitled to further compensation at that time, but his rights were left open under § 12 of the workmen’s com*376pensation act. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152. No appeal was taken from that decision. The case was heard again before a single member on May 2, 1933, on the question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Ahmed's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Meley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Thayer's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Codman v. Assessors of WestwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Conlon v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Rival's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.