Legal Opinion

United States v. Perdomo-Espana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2008No. 07-50232PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Juan Perdomo-Espana (“Perdomo”) appeals his jury conviction for one count of illegal entry into the United States as a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In this opinion, we consider whether the defense of necessity that Per-domo advanced must be tested under an objective or subjective standard. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Determining that the necessity defense requires an objective analysis, we affirm the district court’s denial of Perdomo’s request for a jury instruction on the defense of necessity.

I

In the early morning hours of March…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Carmen Denise HerediaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Hector Arellano-Rivera,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Joann WigganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Hoagland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. Justin SpentzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Charles LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Anaya-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API