United States v. Perdomo-Espana
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Juan Perdomo-Espana (“Perdomo”) appeals his jury conviction for one count of illegal entry into the United States as a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In this opinion, we consider whether the defense of necessity that Per-domo advanced must be tested under an objective or subjective standard. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Determining that the necessity defense requires an objective analysis, we affirm the district court’s denial of Perdomo’s request for a jury instruction on the defense of necessity.
I
In the early morning hours of March…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Carmen Denise HerediaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Hector Arellano-Rivera,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Joann WigganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hoagland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Justin SpentzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Charles LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Anaya-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.