Legal Opinion

Thompson v. American Fruit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1913No. Civ. No. 1175PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County vacating a default judgment. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This purports to be an appeal from an order granting a motion to vacate a judgment rendered and entered upon the default of the defendant.

The appeal cannot be considered for the reason that it has not been prepared in the manner nor perfected to the extent required by law.

The record before us consists of a copy of the following pleadings, papers, and orders in the case, viz.: 1. The plaintiff’s complaint; 2. The summons and the sheriff’s return thereon; 3. The'judgment; 4. Plaintiff’s affidavit in support of motion for judgment on default; '5. Defendant’s notice of motion to vacate judgment;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Walsh v. HutchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Harrison v. CousinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Christenson Lumber Co. v. SeawellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnabee v. HunstockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Boos v. ByrnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Russell v. ChisholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Albertsen v. AlbertsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Avello v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API