Legal Opinion

Russell v. Chisholm

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1914No. Civ. No. 1307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting the motions for a new trial of defendants Chisholm and Gray. The respondents stand at the threshold,of this appeal objecting to its consideration upon the merits on the ground that no properly authenticated transcript on appeal has been perfected or filed. The transcript oh appeal herein has attached to it the certificate of the clerk of the superior court from which the appeal is taken, “that the papers and orders therein contained are tine, full and correct copies of the originals on file and of record in this office, and of the whole thereof,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. American Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boos v. ByrnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Avello v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API