Legal Opinion

Aransas Project v. Shaw

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 11, 2013No. Case No. 2:10-cv-075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND VERDICT OF THE COURT

JANIS GRAHAM JACK, Senior District Judge.

This case was tried to the Court over an eight-day period on December 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, and 15, 2011.1 As required by Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon.2

Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................722

II. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK.............................................726

A. The Endangered Species Act..........................................726

1. ESA § 9 prohibits…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. California River Watch v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API