Legal Opinion
Dawson v. Higgins
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*812OPINION OF THE COURT
Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.
More or less continuously since the early 1940’s the City of New York has had in place one or more plans of rent control which have affected, at one time or the other, much of its rental housing stock. As New Yorkers know, the present regulatory programs — the older New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (Administrative Code of City of NY, tit 26, ch 3) whose applicability is diminishing over time and the newer and now more extensively applied regulation effected through the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY, tit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Grossman v. BaumgartnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fitzgerald v. Cambridge Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994