Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chicago Park District v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1994No. 1-93-2076WCPublished

1DissentJustice Rarick

Although the majority correctly notes that the extent and permanency of a claimant’s disability are questions of fact and that the Commission’s factual determinations will not be overturned unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence (Amoco Oil Co. v. Industrial Comm’n (1991), 218 Ill. App. 3d 737, 748, 578 N.E.2d 1043, 1051), the majority proceeds to find the Commission’s determinations as to total and permanent disability to be against the manifest weight of the evidence in this instance. Manifest weight of the evidence is that which is clearly evident, plain and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. E. R. Moore Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. A.M.T.C. of Illinois, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Beeler v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API