Legal Opinion

Hill v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 2005PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mercure, J.

This appeal provides us with an opportunity to set forth the circumstances in which a hearing officer conducting a tier III prison disciplinary proceeding must personally ascertain the *65reasons for the refusal of an inmate witness to testify on behalf of the charged inmate.

Petitioner, an inmate at Southport Correctional Facility in Chemung County, was directed by a correction officer to give a urine specimen. In a misbehavior report charging him with violations of rules 180.14 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [v] [urinalysis]) and 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i] [direct…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Laureano v. KuhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. MATTER OF BARNES v. LeFevreNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Colon v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Brodie v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Matter of Rafael Cortorreal v. Anthony J. AnnucciNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Seymour v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Cornwall v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Tulloch v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API