Legal Opinion
Medinatura v. Food and Drug Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-2066Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEDINATURA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-2066 (RDM) FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case concerns the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) regulation of homeopathic drugs. For many years, the FDA did not regulate homeopathic drugs at all, promising to get around to them eventually. Then in 1988, to bring homeopathic drugs into at least partial compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FFDCA” or “Act”), the FDA issued Compliance Policy Guide 7132.15,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.