Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1980No. 80-2-349, CA 17426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In sentencing the defendant the trial court did not state its reasons for imposing the sentence. The state argues:

"It is obvious from the record defendant was sentenced to the custody of the Oregon Corrections Division because she is transexual and upon the advice and information provided by opposing counsel. From the verbal exchanges between counsel and the court, it is clear the court acceded to the express wishes of both the prosecution and the defense in sentencing defendant to the custody of the state.
"We respectfully submit that ORS 137.120(2) does not require remand of any case so that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BolducCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API