Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 1978No. C 77-08-10853, CA 9583PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant, having been convicted of first degree burglary, appeals under ORS 138.050 the sentence imposed. He contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in failing to comply with ORS 137.120(2) which states in pertinent part:

"* * * The court shall state on the record the reasons for the sentence imposed.” (Emphasis supplied.)

As we pointed out in State v. Dinkel, 34 Or App 375, 579 P2d 245 (1978), this constituted a legislative mandate. The trial court made the following comments:

"THE COURT: Let’s go through your record. The Court must apparently now give an explanation.
"THE…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API