Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. Lampack
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAILEY.
Bristol Bay Productions, LLC, formerly known as Crusader Entertainment, LLC (Bristol Bay), appeals the district court's judgment dismissing its tort action against defendants, Peter Lampack and Peter Lam-pack Agency, Inc. (together, Lampack); Simon & Schuster, Inc. (Simon & Schuster); and Penguin Group USA, Inc. (Penguin). We affirm the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
*677I. Background
This case concerns the fallout from a failed attempt to convert one of author Clive Cus-sler's "Dirk Pitt" adventure novels into a commercially successful movie. Bristol Bay was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Vanderpool v. LoftnessColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Youngs v. Industrial Claim Appeals officeColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013