Legal Opinion

Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours and Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 27, 2002No. 4-00-CV-90247, 4:00-CV-90286, 4:00-CV-90375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PRATT, District Judge.

The Court has before it Plaintiffs’ Combined Application for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. After settling the merits of this lawsuit, the parties undertook an abbreviated proceeding concerning attorneys’ fees and expenses. That proceeding involved initial briefs, limited discovery, a three day hearing, and post-hearing briefs. The matter is now fully submitted. For the following reasons, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion in part and denies it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs’ combined motion is based on three lawsuits against Defendants Pioneer Hi-Bred…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Lamb Engineering & Construction Company v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. 122.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in Koochiching County, Minnesota and the Estate of Agnes J. Rudser RingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Eagle-North Hills Shopping Centre, L.P.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Antolik v. Saks Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
  3. LaBrier v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API