Legal Opinion

Ogilvie v. Ogilvie

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1972No. 34298PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Judge.

The sole issue here is whether defendant-appellant Bertha May Welland’s promise to “aid and assist” co-defendant Byron Ogilvie in paying his promissory note, payable to plaintiff Mary Ogilvie, is so vague and uncertain a promise as to be unenforceable against her. We hold it is and reverse the trial court’s $3,000 judgment against defendant-appellant Bertha May Welland.

Before Mary Ogilvie filed this action against Byron Ogilvie and Bertha May Welland the Ogilvies had been divorced. In compliance with their marriage settlement Byron executed a $3,000 promissory note payable to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shofler v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Bengimina v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Zoglin v. LaylandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Sebastian County Coal & Mining Co. v. MayerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Wired Music, Inc. v. Great River Steamboat Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. McHenry v. ClaspillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Visiting Nurse Association, St. Louis v. Vnahealthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Springfield Television, Inc. v. GaryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API