Legal Opinion

Bengimina v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1964No. 23925PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Plaintiffs instituted this action in magistrate court by filing a statement alleging that defendants had breached a contract entered into by the parties and that by reason thereof plaintiffs were entitled to liquidated damages. Defendants defaulted and judgment was entered against them in the sum of $2000.00. Defendants appealed to the circuit court and the cause was tried to that court, de novo, without a jury. From a judgment in favor of defendants, denying plaintiffs a recovery, plaintiffs have appealed.

By stipulation of the parties the case was tried in the circuit court on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. L.B. v. State Committee of PsychologistsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Martin v. Prier Brass Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Coffman Industries, Inc. v. Gorman-Taber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API