Legal Opinion

Richards v. Hayden

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 21, 1899No. 362PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Bourbon district court; J. S. West, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

After a full consideration of the record and briefs in this case, we are of the opinion that the only question requiring decision by us is whether the statute of limitations barred plaintiff’s right of recovery on the note executed and delivered to him by the defendant. The action was brought more than five years after the maturity of the note. To avoid the bar of the statute, the plaintiff pleaded that the defendant had made a written acknowledgment of the debt, and in support of such plea introduced a letter, which the defendant admitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Jones v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Gragg v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Diest v. TowleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Hamilton v. BeaubienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API