Legal Opinion

Van Diest v. Towle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1947No. 15,593PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Van Diest gave his demand promissory note to Towle. Nearly thirteen years after the first and only payment of interest thereon, this suit was instituted for judgment on the note and foreclosure of the collateral security then held. Van Diest pleaded the statute of limitations. The case was tried entirely upon written evidence consisting of the note, partial correspondence between the parties, exhibits concerning corporate reorganization and stipulations. The trial court determined that the evidence established an acknowledgment by the defendant of the indebtedness together with an implied…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Clementson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  3. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Sunshine v. M. R. Mansfield Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Sentinel Acceptance Corporation v. ColgateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API