Legal Opinion
Howell v. Kennecott Copper Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 22106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a resident of Scranton, in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, instituted this suit claiming damages for alleged breach by defendant of a contract of employment requiring his services in Nevada. Although defendant does no business in this District and, hence, the alleged contract was presumably made in New York, Nevada, or Scranton, service was attempted to be made by leaving a *223copy of the writ of summons and a copy of the complaint with George Tate, Office Manager of Chase Brass & Copper Company’s Philadelphia office in this District. Chase Brass &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- National Carbide Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Consolidated Textile Corp. v. GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Alexander Young Distilling Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smeltzer v. Deere and CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Electrosonics International, Inc. v. Wurlitzer CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Fitzgerald v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Hendricks v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Maale v. FrancisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.