Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 25945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, residents of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, have brought this action upon a claim that the wife plaintiff was injured while at the Continental Hilton Hotel in Mexico City, Mexico, as a result of negligence on the part of the hotel. Two of the three defendants challenge the attempted service which has been made upon them.

Defendant Hilton Hotels Corporation •(Hilton) is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in Pennsylvania. It has designated United States Corporation Company as its agent for acceptance •of service. Service on defendant Hilton…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Consolidated Textile Corp. v. GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Harriett MacInnes and Malcolm D. MacInnes Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. Robert M. Harris v. Deere and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  5. Rumig v. Ripley Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Fanfan v. Berwind CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In Re Puerto Rico Air Disaster LitigationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
  4. Smeltzer v. Deere and CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Hendricks v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API