Legal Opinion
Sundeen v. Kroger
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided April 9, 2003No. CA 02-575Published
1Opinion of the Court
101 S.W.3d 891 (2003)
Michael Patrick SUNDEEN
v.
KROGER and Jerry Hart.
No. CA 02-575.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III.
April 9, 2003.
Ogles Law Firm, P.A., by: John Ogles, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A., by: Michael J. Emerson and Cynthia J. Worthing, Little Rock, for appellees.
OLLY NEAL, Judge.
Michael Sundeen appeals the Pulaski County Circuit Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Kroger and Jerry Hart, a Kroger employee (Kroger).[1] Sundeen sued Kroger for malicious prosecution and abuse of process following the State's nolle prosse of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Palmer v. Arkansas Council on Economic EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- South Arkansas Petroleum Co. v. SchiesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Kansas & Texas Coal Co. v. GallowaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
- Carmical v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.