Legal Opinion
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 15, 2024No. 4:24-cv-01562Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE ROE, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01562-JST 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: ECF No. 51 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant the City and County of San Francisco’s (“the City”) motion 14 to dismiss. ECF No. 51. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiffs are residents and businesses in the Tenderloin neighborhood in San Francisco. 17 ECF No. 50 ¶ 6. Plaintiffs allege that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.