Legal Opinion
John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Fiorilla
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 19, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 N.J. Super. 151 (1964)
199 A.2d 65
JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROSE FIORILLA, OLAF LUNDEMAN AND THOMAS FIORILLA, A MINOR, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 19, 1964.
Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys for plaintiff (Mr. Eugene M. Haring, appearing).
Messrs. Furst, Furst & Feldman, attorney for defendants (Mr. Irving Mariash, of the New York Bar, appearing; Mr. Martin Duyk, on the brief).
PASHMAN, J.S.C.
Plaintiff John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (herein "Hancock") seeks an interlocutory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- O'Loughlin v. O'LoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Tackling v. Chrysler Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- De Sisto v. City of LindenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Light v. GranatellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- General Atomic Co. v. FelterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- D'Amore v. D'AmoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Riffin v. Circuit Court for Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Drazin v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.