Legal Opinion

Dreyfus v. Dickason

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1936No. 25494PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter presents an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county from a judgment rendered for the defendant in error, Irene Buel Dickason, as plaintiff in the trial court, against Henry Dreyfus, as one of the defendants, quieting title in the plaintiff to certain real estate in the city of Tulsa described as lot 12 in Drew’s subdivision of block 4 of the Campbell addition to the city of Tulsa, Tulsa county, state of Oklahoma. During the pendency of this action in this court Henry Dreyfus, the plaintiff in error, departed this life and the case was revived in the name of Asher Dreyfus,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Japp v. Sapulpa State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Belt v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. McGaffey v. MulkySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mansell v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  2. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Loper v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Ringer v. ByrneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Oklahoma State Bank v. Van HasselSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API