Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Webb
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 7, 2009No. 105,874PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
{1 The issue presented is whether the appellant's motion for new trial was ineffective because it was filed without the signature of his counsel. We hold that because he *732filed a document of record establishing that he had dismissed his counsel before filing the motion, the motion for new trial was not ineffective. We remand the cause to the Court of Civil Appeals for consideration of the issues raised on appeal.
T 2 On April 17, 2003, Brian Wilson (appellant), a prisoner acting pro se, brought a conversion action against his father-in-law, Carl Webb (Webb), and Brent Stapp (Stapp)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Pan v. BaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Honeywell v. Gada Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC. v. DALKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- KPIELE-PODA v. PATTERSON-UTI ENERGYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.