Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Skarbek

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2000No. 18013-1-IIIPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— A rebuttable presumption arises that property acquired during marriage with separate funds is a gift to the community. In re Marriage of Hurd, 69 Wn. App. 38, 51, 848 P.2d 185 (1993). But depositing separate funds in a joint bank account is not an acquisition of property; therefore, no presumption attaches. John Skarbek deposited separate funds in a joint account. But he then traced and identified the separate funds. The court classified those funds as community property. This was error and so we reverse and remand.

FACTS

John and Dina Skarbek were married in 1994 and separated in 1997. In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of GriswoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In Re Marriage of SkarbekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of BorghiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Marriage of ChumbleyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Marriage of WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API